These days, every scandal is tried in the court of public opinion. By getting ahead of the story, you have more control over how the information is reported and perceived in the media. The first explanation was that the funding was cut off pending the results of an investigation announced by Florida Republican congressman Cliff Stearns. Then the public subsequently learned from the media that a senior official of Komen, Karen Handel, was part of the decision-making process that led to the funding cutoff. Two tales—one domestic a U.
Instead, Davis believes, it is important to tell the full story yourself, even if it means sharing unflattering details before they leak on their own. I am convinced that the 47 percent issue would have gone away almost instantly had he said this or something similar. Now it was twenty-six years later. I also wanted to confirm the facts myself. Komen for the Cure foundation to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood.
My first set of interviews with both Ms. Over the years, I learned that the traditional advice of a lawyer to avoid public comment during a legal crisis had become outdated, especially with the impact of the Internet at the turn of the twenty-first century. Good examples of fact-gathering that could not have been done without the attorney-client privilege were the Martha Stewart and HealthSouth controversies. Clinton in the media from expected Republican attacks and congressional investigations. Unfortunately, this practice of operating without the knowledge and approval of senior lawyers may have been okay as an exception, because the White House was a political institution. That would be a showstopper, McCurry would point out.
These days, every scandal is tried in the court of public opinion. Was anyone surprised that doing so left the impression that the White House seemed to be hiding something or evading the topic? The problem is that once you have gotten your nifty new product, the crisis tales five rules for coping with crises in business politics and life gets a brief glance, maybe a once over, but it often tends to get discarded or lost with the original packaging. Quinn, a distinguished Washington, D. I know Lanny so I'm a bit biased. The Clinton fund-raising apparatus for the 1996 reelection campaign was accused of campaign finance violations.
Sometimes our leaks had to be done without the knowledge of senior White House lawyers so they would have deniability when confronted by the Republicans who, hypocritically, would be angry because they would be denied doing the leaking with a more negative spin. When you have the luxury of proactively placing a story with a reporter, you are ready to place your predicate story. So, in short, my advice to Mr. Of course, as inevitably as the sun rising in the east, several more shoes dropped—and it was Mr. Any quotations in the book are not from notes, which it has been my practice for many years not to retain, but are to the best of my recollection. Good examples of fact-gathering that could not have been done without the attorney-client privilege were the Martha Stewart and HealthSouth controversies. These days, every scandal is tried in the court of public opinion.
Crisis Tales Five Rules For Coping With Crises In Business Politics And Life can be very useful guide, and crisis tales five rules for coping with crises in business politics and life play an important role in your products. I knew there was a potential that a full accounting of the facts might lead to legal exposure in the case of each—so before I knew all the facts, I had to have the protection of the attorney-client privilege and then be able to decide what could, or could not, be disclosed to the media to handle the crisis—or whether to have any media strategy at all. Also, any nonattorney in the room can risk the waiver of attorney-client privilege—the rule that communications between a client and an attorney rendering legal advice are immune from subpoenas or compelled testimony. Next we had to get the story out proactively before the Republicans did. Handel may have influenced the decision. Instead, Davis believes, it is important to tell the full story yourself, even if it means sharing unflattering details before they leak on their own. He smiled that mischievous and evil smile I came to know.
After gathering what we hoped were all the facts, good and bad, of interest to reporters and the public, the second step was to try to boil them down to a simple set of messages that people could understand. Usually companies hire separate teams of lawyers to do the litigating, public relations advisors to talk to the press, and public policy or lobbying experts to deal with the politics of the crisis—addressing the concerns of various constituencies affected by the crisis, whether shareholders, voters, or even governments. But in the final analysis, I had only myself—not the Times—to blame for violating all the crisis management rules that I advise others to follow. He found a way to combine his considerable legal, media, and political skills to find a solution satisfactory to all parties. The Komen leaders initially were evasive about acknowledging that the decision had anything to do with politics. Winning your case in a courtroom instead of the media is no longer a viable option.
I needed to be part of this legal fact-gathering process. Instead, Davis believes, it is important to tell the full story yourself, even if it means sharing unflattering details before they leak on their own. You could go the old fashioned route and simply not represent them, or their representatives. I learned this lesson the hard way, as one chapter of this book demonstrates. You are the only one the Clintons can think of who meets three requirements—a lawyer, who understands and can deal with the media, and who also understands politics.